Bill of Pornography and Porn Action
By
Kurniawan
Bill of pornography and porn action thought by commission VIII, Indonesian legislative assembly, shows a great polemic in the society. The discourse of the bill ratification causes never ending controversy. In principle, the bill of pornography and porn action is expected to be able to reduce criminality, especially sexual harshness occurring in the society. Many people welcome the bill gladly. They hope it can be one of the solutions to overcome the escalation of sexual harshness. However, many others oppose the plan. The bill is considered to break the freedom of expression and limits the women very much.
Those who agree with the ratification of bill of pornography and porn action, consider it can be a way that can bring positive effects, the decrease of sexual harshness. Many circles of society support the plan, including religious activists. Moreover, after many mass media make sensuality and eroticism as prospective commodity. Beginning from TV, magazines, and internet provide sensual programs which can be consumed easily by everybody even children.
They assume that pornography is one of factors that causes sexual harshness, raping, violation, and other sexual act despising because it can raise someone sexual desire. And of course, more or less will influence someone mind to satisfy their libido. Then, what about the unmarried man? Certainly anything can happen. According to the data, from year to year, the amount of sexual harshness cases increase rapidly. So the people must not let it. Besides, pornography is exploitation of women because most of the objects are women, photos in the magazines, erotic dances on TV, and many more. Finally, many circles of society not only give statement but also urge the government to legalize the bill of pornography and porn action.
On the contrary, many other people oppose the plan. They consider that the bill is a means of discrimination for woman, as if the sexual harshness is because of the woman. They also assume that the bill will be police of moral which come into domestic matters if it is legalized. Many people and circles of society against the plan of ratification of bill of pornography and porn action, such as; artists and cultural observers. It is connected with the freedom of expression, besides the existence of the bill in the society which can be found easily in the internet.
Basically, those who disagree with the ratification of bill of pornography and porn action, agree that pornography must be organized however the way to organize causes some circles of society mind and refuse the bill of pornography and porn action. Paying close attention to sections in the bill, it is understood that a lot of critical thought appear in the society. It is not only because of the violation of expression freedom that was stated by W.S. Rendra but also ambiguity of understandings which exist in the bill said Prof. Dr. Edy Sediawaty, ex Director General of Culture.
Many people feel fidgety about the plan of ratification of the bill of pornography and porn action that its sections oppose to reality of the way to dress the Indonesia people which are plural. They have different habit and custom. So it is impossible if suddenly they must change their habit, for example the way to dress of Papua people, they are used to wearing koteka then suddenly they are forced to wear closed dress. It can raise big polemic that endangers integration.
The ratification of bill of pornography and porn action has high risk and can bring bad implication for integration of nation. There fore, the things relating to moral should not be solved by law but education at school or at home. It is because, they relate to morality of anyone that is different among the people. The bill of pornography and porn action is potential to criminalize the woman because the contents of the bill are full of prohibition for woman. Disability to organize pornography should not be shifted by blaming the woman.
Those who agree with the ratification of bill of pornography and porn action, consider it can be a way that can bring positive effects, the decrease of sexual harshness. Many circles of society support the plan, including religious activists. Moreover, after many mass media make sensuality and eroticism as prospective commodity. Beginning from TV, magazines, and internet provide sensual programs which can be consumed easily by everybody even children.
They assume that pornography is one of factors that causes sexual harshness, raping, violation, and other sexual act despising because it can raise someone sexual desire. And of course, more or less will influence someone mind to satisfy their libido. Then, what about the unmarried man? Certainly anything can happen. According to the data, from year to year, the amount of sexual harshness cases increase rapidly. So the people must not let it. Besides, pornography is exploitation of women because most of the objects are women, photos in the magazines, erotic dances on TV, and many more. Finally, many circles of society not only give statement but also urge the government to legalize the bill of pornography and porn action.
On the contrary, many other people oppose the plan. They consider that the bill is a means of discrimination for woman, as if the sexual harshness is because of the woman. They also assume that the bill will be police of moral which come into domestic matters if it is legalized. Many people and circles of society against the plan of ratification of bill of pornography and porn action, such as; artists and cultural observers. It is connected with the freedom of expression, besides the existence of the bill in the society which can be found easily in the internet.
Basically, those who disagree with the ratification of bill of pornography and porn action, agree that pornography must be organized however the way to organize causes some circles of society mind and refuse the bill of pornography and porn action. Paying close attention to sections in the bill, it is understood that a lot of critical thought appear in the society. It is not only because of the violation of expression freedom that was stated by W.S. Rendra but also ambiguity of understandings which exist in the bill said Prof. Dr. Edy Sediawaty, ex Director General of Culture.
Many people feel fidgety about the plan of ratification of the bill of pornography and porn action that its sections oppose to reality of the way to dress the Indonesia people which are plural. They have different habit and custom. So it is impossible if suddenly they must change their habit, for example the way to dress of Papua people, they are used to wearing koteka then suddenly they are forced to wear closed dress. It can raise big polemic that endangers integration.
The ratification of bill of pornography and porn action has high risk and can bring bad implication for integration of nation. There fore, the things relating to moral should not be solved by law but education at school or at home. It is because, they relate to morality of anyone that is different among the people. The bill of pornography and porn action is potential to criminalize the woman because the contents of the bill are full of prohibition for woman. Disability to organize pornography should not be shifted by blaming the woman.
No comments:
Post a Comment